Skip to main content

Comparison of Estated vs MSB Data

Updated over 11 months ago

In the insurance industry, having accurate property data is essential for effective underwriting, risk assessment, and policy pricing. Estated and Marshall & Swift/Boeckh (MSB) are two prominent sources for such data.

This article provides a comprehensive comparison between the data retrieved through both Estated & MSB.

[Tap here to learn more about Estated and what it means to you as a SALT subscriber.]


Estated Data

Source:

  • Public records (tax assessor files, county records, real estate listings)

Scope:

  • Residential properties across the U.S.

Data Types:

  • Property characteristics (square footage, bedrooms, bathrooms, lot size, year built)

  • Ownership details (owner name, purchase price, sale date)

  • Property valuation (estimated market value, assessed value)

Usage:

  • Underwriting, marketing, risk assessment, property profiles, validating policyholder information

Strengths:

  • Broad coverage and comprehensive data from multiple sources

  • Regular updates ensure data accuracy

  • Easy API integration for seamless use

  • Cost-effective, providing great value for general property data needs

Limitations:

  • Data accuracy depends on the quality of public records

  • May lack some detailed property features and building materials


MSB Data

Source:

  • Specialized property valuation data, focusing on building costs

Scope:

  • Residential and commercial properties

Data Types:

  • Detailed construction costs (materials, labor, equipment)

  • Property characteristics (building features, quality, materials)

  • Depreciation and replacement cost values

Usage:

  • Property valuation, insurance underwriting, determining accurate replacement costs

Strengths:

  • Highly detailed construction and replacement cost data

  • Regarded as an industry standard for property valuation

  • Regular updates reflecting market trends

Limitations:

  • More expensive compared to other data sources

  • Complex integration requiring specialized tools


Key Differences

  • Data Focus:

    • Estated ~ Broad property data from public records and market values

    • MSB ~ Detailed construction and replacement cost data

  • Use Cases:

    • Estated ~ Ideal for general underwriting, marketing, and validating information

    • MSB ~ Crucial for accurate replacement costs and detailed property valuation

  • Cost and Integration:

    • Estated ~ Cost-effective and easy to integrate

    • MSB ~ Higher cost with more complex integration


While MSB offers detailed and accurate valuation data, Estated stands out as a broad, cost-effective solution for property data needs, providing comprehensive and regularly updated information ideal for a wide range of insurance applications.

Did this answer your question?