Skip to main content
All CollectionsConsidering SALT?
Comparison of Estated vs MSB Data
Comparison of Estated vs MSB Data
Updated over 5 months ago

In the insurance industry, having accurate property data is essential for effective underwriting, risk assessment, and policy pricing. Estated and Marshall & Swift/Boeckh (MSB) are two prominent sources for such data.

This article provides a comprehensive comparison between the data retrieved through both Estated & MSB.

[Tap here to learn more about Estated and what it means to you as a SALT subscriber.]


Estated Data

Source:

  • Public records (tax assessor files, county records, real estate listings)

Scope:

  • Residential properties across the U.S.

Data Types:

  • Property characteristics (square footage, bedrooms, bathrooms, lot size, year built)

  • Ownership details (owner name, purchase price, sale date)

  • Property valuation (estimated market value, assessed value)

Usage:

  • Underwriting, marketing, risk assessment, property profiles, validating policyholder information

Strengths:

  • Broad coverage and comprehensive data from multiple sources

  • Regular updates ensure data accuracy

  • Easy API integration for seamless use

  • Cost-effective, providing great value for general property data needs

Limitations:

  • Data accuracy depends on the quality of public records

  • May lack some detailed property features and building materials


MSB Data

Source:

  • Specialized property valuation data, focusing on building costs

Scope:

  • Residential and commercial properties

Data Types:

  • Detailed construction costs (materials, labor, equipment)

  • Property characteristics (building features, quality, materials)

  • Depreciation and replacement cost values

Usage:

  • Property valuation, insurance underwriting, determining accurate replacement costs

Strengths:

  • Highly detailed construction and replacement cost data

  • Regarded as an industry standard for property valuation

  • Regular updates reflecting market trends

Limitations:

  • More expensive compared to other data sources

  • Complex integration requiring specialized tools


Key Differences

  • Data Focus:

    • Estated ~ Broad property data from public records and market values

    • MSB ~ Detailed construction and replacement cost data

  • Use Cases:

    • Estated ~ Ideal for general underwriting, marketing, and validating information

    • MSB ~ Crucial for accurate replacement costs and detailed property valuation

  • Cost and Integration:

    • Estated ~ Cost-effective and easy to integrate

    • MSB ~ Higher cost with more complex integration


While MSB offers detailed and accurate valuation data, Estated stands out as a broad, cost-effective solution for property data needs, providing comprehensive and regularly updated information ideal for a wide range of insurance applications.

Did this answer your question?